data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db692/db6920dddddcbf2122e275697511aa1aa6731d50" alt="MF TE20"
Ferguson engages Standard Motors to build tractors
Harry Ferguson was an engineer rather than manufacturer at heart, so he had contracted out the building of his tractor to the Standard Motor Company at the old wartime shadow factory in Banner Lane in Coventry.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/248dd/248dd0910536b31681b523c3dc82fedb03d3cb57" alt="Banner Lane Coventry"
Building tractors in Paris
The agreement reached between Standard Motors and the French was that the company could use the old Hotchkiss works in Paris to assemble the kits. It was also agreed that as locally made components became available, they would be increasingly incorporated into the tractors. Production started in 1951 and the French-made content of the tractors very quickly came to dominate. Meanwhile, back in Britain, Massey Harris had purchased Ferguson tractors and it became obvious that as a tractor manufacturer itself, it was not going to continue subcontracting the work to Standard Motors.Massey Ferguson moves tractor production
This indeed turned out to be the case, and the recently formed Massey Harris Ferguson company decided to build a brand new factory in the town of Beauvais, north east of Paris, to make a new tractor.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f799/3f79942c9ef1657165c6df5ffdd4ce77129567d7" alt="Massey Ferguson MF35"
A completely new tractor
There is the suggestion that Standard Motors wished to continue producing tractors in France after the links with Massey Ferguson were cut, leading them to build a couple of prototypes designed by their French engineers. This might help explain some of the problems of the ill-fated MF25, if a further piece of intrigue is added to the tale.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a2c4/5a2c475640a6857b1577f087d0b98a48b52decde" alt="MF 825"
A dastardly plan?
Should this have been part of a plot to stall the a British company's plans for France, then it might be equally possible that the design engineers were also involved.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c837a/c837a8fc49ef42059083c0d995af74863c36edd5" alt="MF 25 engine"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdefc/fdefc0284584d99c4c5e038fa81500b799650417" alt="Half shafts"
Oil immersed dry brakes
Brakes were the second issue, or the lack of them that is. The brakes were dry disc units, but instead of two pads gripping one disc from the outside, there was the novel arrangement of having one pad being forced between two discs. This had two major drawbacks, first it was not particularly effective as the discs could flex away from the pad, the second was that in doing so they would bend the drive shaft. The bent drive shafts would then distort the oil seal on the transmission, leading to a leakage of oil onto the hitherto dry discs with predictable and unfortunate, consequences.Jammed gears
Issue number three was second gear, which once selected would often stay selected despite the most strenuous efforts to deselect it, splitting the tractor being necessary often to complete the operation.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea294/ea29400b34731abbbf508ad31cbd455c7d044047" alt="Gearbox second gear"