A study being conducted at the University of Leeds Farm is aiming to highlight the “fantastic” benefits of regenerative agriculture.
The data for the study was collected by soil stations created by Paul-Tech, an Estonian agri-tech company.
The study compares soil health, crop production, greenhouse gas emissions, and profit of different farming systems across seven 12m x 40m plots.
Some of the plots were ploughed and power harrowed, while others underwent minimal cultivation using non-inversion, shallow cultivation.
Cover cropping, living mulches, manures, livestock integration, and herbal leys have also been utilised as part of the trial.
Paul-Tech chief executive Mikk Plakk said the findings will have a “significant bearing” on how farmers should be treating soil.
The trial is being led by Dr Ruth Wade, Research Fellow at the University of Leeds.
“The results coming from this regenerative agriculture plot trial will provide important data on the impacts of different farming systems both on the environment but also for the farm business,” she said.
Study
Paul-Tech’s soil stations take real-time readings of nutrient availability, soil water levels and soil temperature at depths of 8cm and 20cm.
Each plot received three treatments of nitrogen throughout the trial, with nutrient and water availability measured at both depths after each application.
The stations revealed that the trial plots which had minimal cultivation held more nutrients and water around the root zone for longer than plots that had been ploughed.
As a result, the minimal cultivated plots recorded a significantly larger nutrient release after fertilisation and higher nutrient availability at the 8cm mark compared to the ploughed plots, and nutrients were held around the rootzone for longer.
By contrast, water quickly drained through the ploughed soil, leading to a significantly smaller nutrient release at fertilisation and considerably less nutrients available to the plants at 8cm.
Soil temperature was also impacted by the cultivation method with the ploughed soil experiencing much larger temperature changes over the course of the trial.
The ploughed soil froze when air temperatures dipped below zero, whereas those sown under a minimal cultivation system maintained a much more stable temperature throughout and did not freeze.
Paul-Tech’s soil system will see its official UK launch at LAMMA on January 17 & 18 at Birmingham’s NEC.
Soil stations
Plakk said the data from soil stations clearly shows soil nutrient availability and temperature differences between plots with different cultivation methods.
“For example, the soil in the conventional ploughed plot froze at root level and showed significant temperature differences while the minimal cultivated plots didn’t freeze and temperatures were relatively consistent in the root zone,” he said.
“Also, in the minimal cultivated plots, the soil was much more effective at holding water, which meant far more nutrients were available at 8cm than was the case in the ploughed plots.
“The findings have a significant bearing on how farmers should be treating soil. They strongly suggest cultivation methods have the potential to significantly improve soil and plant health while reducing the amount of inputs they need to apply.”
“Getting access to real-time, high frequency data from the soil station was vital for this study and will be equally valuable for farmers.”
